Apparels vs Apparel
This sign at Marks & Spencer at Parkway Parade says: 20% off Ladies’ printed apparels & bras It should say ‘apparel’, not ‘apparels’. The sign also says: Image for illustration purpose only We can...
This sign at Marks & Spencer at Parkway Parade says: 20% off Ladies’ printed apparels & bras It should say ‘apparel’, not ‘apparels’. The sign also says: Image for illustration purpose only We can...
This one is worse than “Established Since 1984”. This sign on one of the shophouses at Boat Quay should just say “Built in 1826”. In fact, all you’d have to do to fix it...
The intent of this phrase is to designate zones in which people are permitted neither to get in a taxi nor to get out of one. However, I think “no-boarding and no-alighting” is a...
… but not both? Another problem with conjunctions! The intent is: Report all the suspicious individuals and all the suspicious items you notice. But it’s getting confused with: If you see a suspicious individual...
If you thought AutoCorrect only affected text messages, think again. Whoever was responsible for inputting the marketing text that describes the features of this stackable jewelry box got as far as “feat—” and then...
It used to be normal to say “[someone] craved for [something]” instead of “[someone] craved [something]”. The former sounds like a mistake to me, as if the speaker meant to say “[someone] had a...
Whoops! The sign in front of this shop in the basement of United Square is implying that healthy Korean food is usually not delicious. I mean, okay, maybe, but that’s not what you want...
Far East Plaza is a warren of small fashion shops (and, sadly, fewer bookstores than it was when I arrived in Singapore in 2008). Whenever I read the signs advertising promotions and discounts, I...
I posted a photo of this restaurant before because the name seemingly advertised so many kinds of food. They’ve simplified the name—presumably not because they saw my blog post, but who knows? Now they...